On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrum...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All > > Second patch enables several Silvermont uarch features which improve > performance of the new processor (based on experiments on real SLM > hardware): > 1. If using a 2-source or 3-source LEA for non-destructive destination > purposes, or due to wanting ability to use SCALE, the use of LEA is > preferable. > 2. Transformation of FP conversion for memory operands into conversion > from register. > 3. Couple of improvements for post-reload scheduling: > - increase latency of integer loads and load/store with exact dependence; > - simple re-ordering of the top of ready list - if 2 instructions > at the top of the list have the same priority we consider instruction > which producer(s) were scheduled earlier as the best candidate. > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk? > > 2013-05-30 Yuri Rumyantsev <yuri.s.rumyant...@intel.com> > Igor Zamyatin <igor.zamya...@intel.com> > > Silvermont (SLM) architecture performance tuning. > * config/i386/i386.h (enum ix86_tune_indices): Add > X86_TUNE_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS. > (TARGET_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS): New define. > > * config/i386/i386.c (initial_ix86_tune_features) > <X86_TUNE_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS>: Initialize. > (ix86_lea_outperforms): Handle Silvermont tuning. > (ix86_avoid_lea_for_add): Add new argument to ix86_lea_outperforms > call. > (ix86_use_lea_for_mov): Likewise. > (ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr): Likewise. > (ix86_lea_for_add_ok): Likewise. > (exact_dependency_1): New function. > (exact_store_load_dependency): Likewise. > (ix86_adjust_cost): Handle Silvermont tuning. > (do_reoder_for_imul): Likewise. > (swap_top_of_ready_list): New function. > (ix86_sched_reorder): Changed to handle Silvermont tuning. > > * config/i386/i386.md (peepholes that split memory operand in fp > converts): New
@@ -24625,9 +24730,9 @@ ix86_sched_reorder(FILE *dump, int sched_verbose, rtx *ready, int *pn_ready, - con = DEP_CON (dep); - if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (con)) - continue; + con = DEP_CON (dep); + if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (con)) + continue; There are some unnecessary whitespace changes (tabs->spaces) in a couple of places throughout the patch, such as in the above lines. +(define_peephole2 + [(set (match_operand:DF 0 "register_operand") + (float_extend:DF + (match_operand:SF 1 "memory_operand")))] + "TARGET_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS + && optimize_insn_for_speed_p () + && SSE_REG_P (operands[0])" + [(set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 1)) + (set (match_dup 0) (float_extend:DF (match_dup 2)))] +{ + operands[2] = gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (operands[0])); +}) You should use (match_scratch:SF 2 "x") at the top of the peephole2 pattern, and you will get a free scratch register (assuming that it is not necessary to use the same register for input and output operand of the float_extend insn). Otherwise, the patch looks OK to me. Uros.