On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Yuri Rumyantsev <ysrum...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All
>
> Second patch enables several Silvermont uarch features which improve
> performance of the new processor (based on experiments on real SLM
> hardware):
> 1. If using a 2-source or 3-source LEA for non-destructive destination
> purposes, or due to wanting ability to use SCALE, the use of LEA is
> preferable.
> 2. Transformation of FP conversion for memory operands into conversion
> from register.
> 3. Couple of improvements  for post-reload scheduling:
>     - increase latency of integer loads and load/store with exact dependence;
>     - simple re-ordering of the top of ready list - if 2 instructions
> at the top of the list have the same priority we consider instruction
> which producer(s) were scheduled earlier as the best candidate.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>
> 2013-05-30  Yuri Rumyantsev  <yuri.s.rumyant...@intel.com>
>              Igor Zamyatin  <igor.zamya...@intel.com>
>
>         Silvermont (SLM) architecture performance tuning.
>         * config/i386/i386.h (enum ix86_tune_indices): Add
>         X86_TUNE_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS.
>         (TARGET_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS): New define.
>
>         * config/i386/i386.c (initial_ix86_tune_features)
>         <X86_TUNE_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS>: Initialize.
>         (ix86_lea_outperforms): Handle Silvermont tuning.
>         (ix86_avoid_lea_for_add): Add new argument to ix86_lea_outperforms
>         call.
>         (ix86_use_lea_for_mov): Likewise.
>         (ix86_avoid_lea_for_addr): Likewise.
>         (ix86_lea_for_add_ok): Likewise.
>         (exact_dependency_1): New function.
>         (exact_store_load_dependency): Likewise.
>         (ix86_adjust_cost): Handle Silvermont tuning.
>         (do_reoder_for_imul): Likewise.
>         (swap_top_of_ready_list): New function.
>         (ix86_sched_reorder): Changed to handle Silvermont tuning.
>
>         * config/i386/i386.md (peepholes that split memory operand in fp
>         converts): New

@@ -24625,9 +24730,9 @@ ix86_sched_reorder(FILE *dump, int
sched_verbose, rtx *ready, int *pn_ready,

-      con = DEP_CON (dep);
-      if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (con))
-        continue;
+          con = DEP_CON (dep);
+          if (!NONDEBUG_INSN_P (con))
+            continue;

There are some unnecessary whitespace changes (tabs->spaces) in a
couple of places throughout the patch, such as in the above lines.

+(define_peephole2
+  [(set (match_operand:DF 0 "register_operand")
+        (float_extend:DF
+          (match_operand:SF 1 "memory_operand")))]
+  "TARGET_SPLIT_MEM_OPND_FOR_FP_CONVERTS
+   && optimize_insn_for_speed_p ()
+   && SSE_REG_P (operands[0])"
+  [(set (match_dup 2) (match_dup 1))
+   (set (match_dup 0) (float_extend:DF (match_dup 2)))]
+{
+  operands[2] = gen_rtx_REG (SFmode, REGNO (operands[0]));
+})

You should use

(match_scratch:SF 2 "x")

at the top of the peephole2 pattern, and you will get a free scratch
register (assuming that it is not necessary to use the same register
for input and output operand of the float_extend insn).

Otherwise, the patch looks OK to me.

Uros.

Reply via email to