On 05/16/2013 11:10 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 10:58 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Hmm, not terribly happy with that wording, but that gives you an idea of
what I'm after. When would someone set UPDATE_DOMINANCE to true and what
are their responsibilities when they do so.
Approved with the name change and a better comment for UPDATE_DOMINANCE.
Btw, the function does _not_ handle arbitrary SEME regions - it only handles
a single exit correctly and assumes no (SSA) data flows across the others.
So I'd rather not rename it.
Richard.
Jeff
I went ahead and checked in the change with the comment updates that
Jeff wanted but left the name of the function as is.
Ok. Thanks.
jeff
