On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 10:58 +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > Hmm, not terribly happy with that wording, but that gives you an idea of > > what I'm after. When would someone set UPDATE_DOMINANCE to true and what > > are their responsibilities when they do so. > > > > Approved with the name change and a better comment for UPDATE_DOMINANCE. > > Btw, the function does _not_ handle arbitrary SEME regions - it only handles > a single exit correctly and assumes no (SSA) data flows across the others. > So I'd rather not rename it. > > Richard. > > > Jeff
I went ahead and checked in the change with the comment updates that Jeff wanted but left the name of the function as is. Steve Ellcey sell...@imgtec.com
