Hi,
On 04/24/2013 06:55 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/24/2013 12:48 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com>
wrote:
I would really rather avoid introducing another macro to be removed
again
later. Instead, let's use a value of __cplusplus greater than 201103L,
perhaps 201300?
yes, that makes sense, and even a better path forward.
Hopefully, the next committee draft will have that value.
We won't have a value for the next standard until we have a next
standard, so let's just invent a value for now; presumably people will
know better than to check for that invented value specifically.
This "invention" scared me, that's why I didn't even propose it. Anyway,
for the time being I'm going to simply revert what I committed earlier
today. It would be great if somebody can implement the __cplusplus
change as soon as possible.
Thanks!
Paolo.
