On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I believe this is all we need in order to get the ball rolling in the > library for -std=c++1y. > > If we think it's conceptually clearer (no difference in practice, because > cxx11 == cxx0x), for the legacy C++0x macro we could also do: > > if (cxx_dialect >= cxx0x && cxx_dialect < cxx1y) > cpp_define (pfile, "__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__"); > > I'm finishing testing the below on x86_64-linux. > > Thanks, > Paolo. > > ///////////////////////
I prefer the patch as you posted it. I would like us to actually move to deprecate __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ in GCC-4.9 and remove it in the release after that. I don't think our support C++11 is still that experimental. we can't have experimental support for two C++ standards going on :-) Other implementations are thumping the chest about being C++11 feature complete for less than what we offer. Patch OK. -- Gaby
