On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwall...@salomon.at> wrote: > > On 01/30/2013 03:16 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: >> <michael.haubenwall...@salomon.at> wrote: >>> 4: Also, LD_LIBRARY_PATH points to ppc64/libstdc++-v3/.libs/ while using >>> 32bit gcc/xgcc to build libatomic.a. >>> => This is the one that /does/ break, as that 64bit libstdc++.a is there >>> now. > >> Originally, I was using --boot-ld-flags which included /usr/gnu/lib >> first in the path, so an older version of libstdc++ was found. > > Yes, but - sorry for being nit-picky - could you find out if your > /usr/gnu/lib/libstdc++.a was a static-only archive?
libstdc++.a is a shared library. 32 bit version. But it was first in the path, so satisfying GCC cc1, cc1plus, etc. built as a 32 bit executable. The libstdc++ ABI has not changed, so the library provide all of the necessary functions. Thanks, David
