On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 11:02:01AM +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>> r194120.
>> I've tested it on Linux, but not on Mac.
>
> kcc,
>    Tested at r194135 on x86_64-apple-darwin12. Thanks for the commit.
>            Jack
> ps Since clang in svn trunk has already switched to the mac function 
> imposition version of asan,

did it?

> it might be time to deprecate mach_override out of llvm's compiler-rt trunk so
> lib/interception/mach_override/, lib/interception/interception_mac.cc and
> lib/interception/interception_mac.h could be removed.
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Alexander Potapenko <gli...@google.com> 
>> wrote:
>> > I've added MISSING_BLOCKS_SUPPORT to LLVM compiler-rt in r169206.
>> > The rest of your change looks good to me as well.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Alexander Potapenko <gli...@google.com> 
>> > wrote:
>> >> Jack,
>> >>
>> >> Note that MAC_INTERPOSE_FUNCTIONS is always defined in interception.h
>> >> to either 0 or 1.
>> >> I'm going to keep "#if MAC_INTERPOSE_FUNCTIONS" (adding "&&
>> >> !defined(MISSING_BLOCKS_SUPPORT)
>> >> " where appropriate) in libsanitizer.
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> 
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>   The attached patch eliminates PR 55521/sanitizer by switching libasan 
>> >>>> on darwin
>> >>>> from using mach_override to mac function interposition
>> >>>
>> >>> So, I'm thinking the sanitizer people will just review and approve it, 
>> >>> even though it says darwin and is heavily darwin specific…  It's ok by 
>> >>> me.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Alexander Potapenko
>> >> Software Engineer
>> >> Google Moscow
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Alexander Potapenko
>> > Software Engineer
>> > Google Moscow

Reply via email to