r194120.
I've tested it on Linux, but not on Mac.

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:44 AM, Alexander Potapenko <gli...@google.com> wrote:
> I've added MISSING_BLOCKS_SUPPORT to LLVM compiler-rt in r169206.
> The rest of your change looks good to me as well.
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Alexander Potapenko <gli...@google.com> wrote:
>> Jack,
>>
>> Note that MAC_INTERPOSE_FUNCTIONS is always defined in interception.h
>> to either 0 or 1.
>> I'm going to keep "#if MAC_INTERPOSE_FUNCTIONS" (adding "&&
>> !defined(MISSING_BLOCKS_SUPPORT)
>> " where appropriate) in libsanitizer.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> On Dec 3, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Jack Howarth <howa...@bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
>>>>   The attached patch eliminates PR 55521/sanitizer by switching libasan on 
>>>> darwin
>>>> from using mach_override to mac function interposition
>>>
>>> So, I'm thinking the sanitizer people will just review and approve it, even 
>>> though it says darwin and is heavily darwin specific…  It's ok by me.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Potapenko
>> Software Engineer
>> Google Moscow
>
>
>
> --
> Alexander Potapenko
> Software Engineer
> Google Moscow

Reply via email to