On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 13:00 +0400, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:19 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > From: Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:41:03 +0400
> >
> >> Ok. Will this work?
> >>
> >> // Are we using 32-bit or 64-bit syscalls?
> >> // x32 (which defines __x86_64__) has __WORDSIZE == 32
> >> // but it still needs to use 64-bit syscalls.
> >> #if defined(__x86_64__) || __WORDSIZE == 64
> >> # define SANITIZER_LINUX_USES_64BIT_SYSCALLS 1
> >> #else
> >> # define SANITIZER_LINUX_USES_64BIT_SYSCALLS 0
> >> #endif
> >
> > Of course, as it matches the test H.J. Liu's patch used.
> >
> > Please, at a bare minimum, give him some credit for this fix.
> 
> Done: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=168358&view=rev

I assume we are just waiting for someone to commit this to the GCC src,
correct?  David (Miller), were you going to do that?  I'd like that
change committed before I commit our ppc asan changes.

Peter


Reply via email to