On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > + > + /* If we have a basic-block with no successors that does not > + end with a control statement or a noreturn call connect it > + to itself. This situation can occur when inlining a noreturn > + call that does in fact return. */
Might want to update the comment. Ciao! Steven
