> I think it would be a good idea to keep things unchanged at -O1. For
> that, the patch needs a few minor modifications (remove calls to
> df_live_add_problem and make some code to update DF_LIVE_{IN,OUT}
> conditional). I can prepare an updated patch for that, if you think
> that's best.

That was just a proposal to be put on the table. :-)  Others, especially Vlad 
of course, have the final say.  And I somewhat sympathize with the cautious 
approach here, because we were forced to downgrade from DF_LIVE to DF_LR for 
resource.c at some point (but of course it's resource.c so...).

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to