> IRA should be using the DF-LIVE sets, which are smaller than the DF-LR
> sets when they are available (typically at O2 and above). The proper
> sets can be conveniently accessed using the df_get_live_[in,out]
> functions which use DF-LIVE if it is available and fall back to DF-LR
> if it is not.
> [...]
> At optimize>1 the DF_LIVE problem is already always computed. I think
> the idea here was to *remove* the DF_LIVE problem at -O1, which is
> also part of the attached patch.
> (Perhaps we should even simply not add the DF_LIVE problem at -O1, but
> that can be done in a follow-up patch if necessary.)

So, in the end, does the patch enable DF_LIVE at -O1 or not?  There seems to 
be a contradiction between the subject and the body of the message.  If yes, 
perhaps an acceptable compromise would be to keep things unchanged at -O1.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Reply via email to