Hi Robin,
I just sent v2.
> Is VWEXTI = VWEXTI_HS + VWEXTI_D? I guess it should :) Can we combine
> it?
>
I rewrote the new VWEXTI iterator using VWEXTI_HS and VWEXTI_D in v2.
> > +(define_mode_iterator V_VLSI_SD [V_VLSI_S V_VLSI_D])
> > +
>
> Leftover?
>
Removed.
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/zvabd-2.c
> > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/zvabd-2.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..a3e624d8362
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/zvabd-2.c
> > +
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {vabd\.vv} } } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {vwabda\.vv} } } */
>
> Can you fold these into zvabd-1.c? Add the unsupported types to
> TEST_ALL and keep the assembler tests the same.
>
Done.
> Of course execution tests would be nice as well. I'd say not in scope
> for this fix but generally desirable. That would be a somewhat
> larger change due to the necessary testsuite/dejagnu boilerplate.
Maybe I could send a separate patch on this later?
>
> The rest looks good to me.
>
> --
> Regards
> Robin
Thanks,
Bohan
