On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Lawrence Crowl <cr...@google.com> wrote: > > The problem is that while T is customary as a template parameter, I > have never seen it used as a typedef name. And that's the situation > that we are in now.
this should be a no-brainer: T should be reserved for the name of the template parameter. [...] > I think we really do need a separate convention for the two, > because dependent members of class templates often need special > access syntax. Yes. -- Gaby
