On 12/8/25 17:33, Paul Koning wrote:
On Dec 7, 2025, at 4:36 PM, Sandra Loosemore <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/7/25 13:18, Paul Koning wrote:
The pdp-11 changes look mostly ok but I have two questions.
1. Why did you remove -munix-asm, mdec-asm and -mgnu-asm along with -mlro from
the gccoptlist at the top?
My patch doesn't do that. :-)
Maybe I misread the diff, but it says:
@emph{PDP-11 Options} (@ref{PDP-11 Options})
-@gccoptlist{-mfpu -msoft-float -mac0 -mno-ac0 -m40 -m45 -m10
--mint32 -mno-int16 -mint16 -mno-int32
+@gccoptlist{-mfpu -msoft-float -mac0 -m40 -m45 -m10
+-mint32 -mint16
-msplit -munix-asm -mdec-asm -mgnu-asm -mlra}
which looks like the last line is going away. Or does that content appear
through some other magic?
I think your mailer must be dropping the initial space on that line. If
I were deleting it, it would start "--m" instead of "-m". Also, it
would leave the braces unbalanced and the documentation would fail to
build. :-P
You might look at the mail in the archive, which is properly formatted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-December/703050.html
2. -m40 and -m45 aren't supposed to have negative forms. I guess I'm missing
RejectNegative in the option definition.
I can make that change, as long as you think it qualifies as "obvious" enough
that I don't need to build/regression test GCC for this target.
Yes, I'm comfortable with that.
OK, I'll take care of it.
-Sandra
