Hi Max, thanks for all the regression testing! On 2025/11/01 13:39, Max Filippov wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 11:24 PM Takayuki 'January June' Suwa <[email protected]> wrote:** snip ** ;; after test: entry sp, 32 movi.n a8, 1 slli a8, a8, 31 addi.n a2, a2, a8 retw.n ** snip ** (define_insn "negsf2" - [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "register_operand" "=f") - (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand" "f")))] + [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "register_operand") + (neg:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "register_operand"))) + (clobber (match_scratch:SI 2))] "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT" - "neg.s\t%0, %1" - [(set_attr "type" "farith") - (set_attr "mode" "SF") - (set_attr "length" "3")]) + {@ [cons: =0, 1, =2; attrs: type, length] + [D, D, &a; arith , 7] movi.n\t%2, 1\;slli\t%2, %2, 31\;addi.n\t%0, %1, %2Changed `addi.n` to `add.n`, which was meant here. Regtested for target=xtensa-linux-uclibc, no new regressions. Committed the whole series to master.
Oh, what a ... Thank you for noticing and correcting my silly mistake X( ----- [email protected]
