On 4/18/25 2:43 AM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
Applied to trunk (16.0.0), thank you!
Should this be backported to the GCC-15 release branch as well?
We don't have this on by default on the branch and it's a new option, so
one could make the argument it's not a regression and inappropriate.
But one could also make the argument that it's a lot harder to evaluate
the new option if it's ICEing due to this problem.
I'd lean towards including it, but final call is Jakub or Richi,
particularly since we've branched for the gcc-15 release.
jeff
