On Apr 15, 2025, Peter Bergner <berg...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On 4/14/25 11:35 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> That said, that should be done in a separate patch. >> >> *nod*. Do you mean you're going to make that change, that I should, or >> that you hope someone else will? I'd rather avoid duplication, and this >> is likely a somewhat involved change, since the string powerpc64 appears >> all over gcc/testsuite/, with various meanings other than a dejagnu >> effective target.
> Sorry. I meant to say I'll have someone from my team do this follow-on patch. > Yes, it will probably hit quite a few test cases. No need for you to worry > about that. I see, thanks for the clarification. Since that sort of broad change will presumably not make gcc-15 (it wouldn't fix a regression, not even the problem addressed by the upthread patch), may I understand your initial response in this thread as approval of that patch? That wasn't clear either. (Sorry if that comes across as asking something obvious; I've noticed misalignments between my expectations of obviousness and those of other ppc maintainers before, so I've learned to be extra cautious) -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://blog.lx.oliva.nom.br/ Free Software Activist FSFLA co-founder GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity. Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive!
