On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 08/04/2012 05:16 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I'm not sure to understand which specific testcase you are discussing, but
for sure we don't want regressions. I agree that we should assume a priori
that the standard is right, but correcting the make_pair should not lead
to failures elsewhere (unless a proper analysis establishes that the
existing testcases are wrong)
Let's say it currently works by accident. What I believe is needed is to
implement the missing emplace function, and then operator[] and others can
be made to use it.
Are you really sure that emplace is involved? I'm not. The letter of the
standard uses 'inserts'.
The font indicates it is "english" insert, not "function" insert. In the
testcase, value_type is not move constructible, so once you have an object
of type value_type, you can't do anything with it.
--
Marc Glisse
