On 08/03/2012 05:19 PM, Ollie Wild wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote:
Ok, but, can you also double check and in case fix unordered_map too?
Looks like we have the same issue, right?
Indeed, we do. I'll send a separate patch for the unordered_map problem.
But apparently something doesn't work together with the complex tangle
of issues having to do with Core/1402 (aka c++/53733): the new testcase
doesn't compile in mainline.
Thus, I'm reverting the patch for now. The we'll have to reanalyze
whether the library specs should be further tweaked (beyond the
container' bits of libstdc++/53657) in the light of Core/1402.
Paolo.
