> On 24 Mar 2025, at 16:41, Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> wrote: > > > >> On 24 Mar 2025, at 16:38, Robert Dubner <rdub...@symas.com> wrote: >> >> How about you create the new patch and just edit out the regenerated >> configure before sending the e-mail? Typing "autoreconf" isn't hard. > > OK. I can do that (historically that is what we always have done, but now we > have CI infrastructure and that does not (yet) know how to deal with partial > patches). In this case I don’t think the 700k of generated output is helpful… > > Will do soon - I’m just rebasing on the updates fomr approved patches and > the rust set…
.. that’s done, based onto r15-8868-g57fdc97dac1453 * edited out the regenerated file diffs * retesting for good measure * pushed “master-wip-cobol-s” to GH in case the hand-editting messes up the patch, OK for trunk, (assuming that the re-tests pass) my testing is bootstrap on x86_64 & aarch64 linux + existing testcases. (plus x86_64 darwin with additional patches needed to get it to build) thanks Iain
0001-libgcobol-C-ify-the-configuration-steps.patch
Description: Binary data
