How about you create the new patch and just edit out the regenerated configure before sending the e-mail? Typing "autoreconf" isn't hard.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Iain Sandoe <i...@sandoe.co.uk> > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2025 11:06 > To: Robert Dubner <rdub...@symas.com> > Cc: James K. Lowden <jklow...@schemamania.org>; GCC Patches <gcc- > patc...@gcc.gnu.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgcobol: C++-ify the configuration steps. > > Hi > > > On 24 Mar 2025, at 14:50, Robert Dubner <rdub...@symas.com> wrote: > > > > No I am not sure what to do. > > > > I tried to apply this patch, both the the master branch and to one of my > > working copies. > > My apologies, some of what I am doing depends on the work that you, Richi > and Jakub have been doing, and so I have a short branch (where each new > piece is tested independently). > > This branch > https://github.com/iains/gcc-git/commits/master-wip-cobol-posted/ > or > https://forge.sourceware.org/iains/gcc-TEST/src/branch/master-wip-cobol- > posted > is up to date. > > I guess it > https://forge.sourceware.org/iains/gcc- > TEST/commit/a7f0adf9a1ee557c088b08288f89c15c5def3059 > > will not cherry-pick cleanly without the (trivial) change here: > https://forge.sourceware.org/iains/gcc- > TEST/commit/67f7bee807ccb2cfd070e17460339e611a3c3bce > > If it helps I can make a new branch with just this patch on it (the actual > changes are > quite small but the regeneration of the output makes the patch huge). > > Iain
