On 2/3/25 7:14 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 2/3/25 2:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> I believe the original patch should be reverted. Then my patch isn't needed. > > That patch had significant improvements across the board for RISC-V. > I wouldn't want to see it reverted without a strong explanation of why it was > wrong.
In my opinion, the patch is not wrong, but rather has exposed latent issues that need to be worked on and fixed. Ive asked Surya to continue working on the fallout (see her other patches), but help from others is always appreciated. Peter
