On 2/3/25 2:31 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:


IMO at this point a new target hook should preserve existing behavior by default
or alternatively the original patch should be reverted as causing
regressions and
a new patch introducing the target hook should be installed in next stage1.

I believe the original patch should be reverted.  Then my patch isn't needed.
That patch had significant improvements across the board for RISC-V. I wouldn't want to see it reverted without a strong explanation of why it was wrong.



jeff

Reply via email to