Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 6:18 PM Aleksandar Rakic > <aleksandar.ra...@htecgroup.com> wrote: >> >> This patch series improves the support for the mips64r6 target in GCC, >> includes the enhancements to the general bug fixes and contains other >> MIPS ISA and processor enablement. >> >> These patches are cherry-picked from the mips_rel/11_2_0/master >> and mips_rel/9_3_0/master branches from the MIPS' repository: >> https://github.com/MIPS/gcc . >> Further details on the individual changes are included in the >> respective patches. > > Please split up this series at least into patches that solely affect mips/ > and send patches that touch middle-end parts separately. A 61 patches > series is unlikely to be looked at this way.
Sorry to ask, but what about the copyright assignment/DCO side of things? Is it ok to assume that all these patches are covered by MTI's copyright assignment with the FSF, even though MTI didn't submit the patches themselves? (Genuine question, not trying to imply a particular answer.) Thanks, Richard
