Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com> writes:
>> >
>> > How about instead doing something like:
>> >
>> >   worklist.reserve (nelts);
>> >   for (int i = 0; i < nelts; ++i)
>> >     worklist.quick_push (force_reg (elem_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)));
>> >
>> >   while (nelts > 2)
>> >     {
>> >       for (int i = 0; i < nelts; i += 2)
>> >         {
>> >           ...read worklist[i] and worklist[i + 1]...
>> >           ...write back to worklist[i / 2]...
>> >         }
>> >       nelts /= 2;
>> >     }
>> >
>> >   emit_insn (gen_aarch64_pack_partial (mode, target, worklist[0],
>> >                                    worklist[1]));
>> >
>>
>> I think this is better since we above the memmove.. Apologies for the bug ☹
>>
>> I'll respin.
>
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
>
> Ok for master?
>
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR target/96342
>         PR target/118272
>         * config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md (vec_init<mode><Vquad>,
>         vec_initvnx16qivnx2qi): New.
>         * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc 
> (aarch64_sve_expand_vector_init_subvector):
>         Rewrite to support any arbitrary combinations.
>         * config/aarch64/iterators.md (SVE_NO2E): Update to use SVE_NO4E
>         (SVE_NO2E, Vquad): New.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         PR target/96342
>         PR target/118272
>         * gcc.target/aarch64/vect-simd-clone-3.c: New test.
>
> -- inline copy of patch --
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md 
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
> index 
> 6659bb4fcab34699f22ff883825de1cd67108203..35f55bfacfc3238a8a7aa69015f36ba32981af59
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-sve.md
> @@ -2839,6 +2839,7 @@ (define_expand "vec_init<mode><Vel>"
>    }
>  )
>
> +;; Vector constructor combining two half vectors { a, b }
>  (define_expand "vec_init<mode><Vhalf>"
>    [(match_operand:SVE_NO2E 0 "register_operand")
>     (match_operand 1 "")]
> @@ -2849,6 +2850,28 @@ (define_expand "vec_init<mode><Vhalf>"
>    }
>  )
>
> +;; Vector constructor combining four quad vectors { a, b, c, d }
> +(define_expand "vec_init<mode><Vquad>"
> +  [(match_operand:SVE_NO4E 0 "register_operand")
> +   (match_operand 1 "")]
> +  "TARGET_SVE"
> +  {
> +    aarch64_sve_expand_vector_init_subvector (operands[0], operands[1]);
> +    DONE;
> +  }
> +)
> +
> +;; Vector constructor combining eight vectors { a, b, c, d, ... }
> +(define_expand "vec_initvnx16qivnx2qi"
> +  [(match_operand:VNx16QI 0 "register_operand")
> +   (match_operand 1 "")]
> +  "TARGET_SVE"
> +  {
> +    aarch64_sve_expand_vector_init_subvector (operands[0], operands[1]);
> +    DONE;
> +  }
> +)
> +
>  ;; Shift an SVE vector left and insert a scalar into element 0.
>  (define_insn "vec_shl_insert_<mode>"
>    [(set (match_operand:SVE_FULL 0 "register_operand")
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> index 
> cb9b155826d12b622ae0df1736e4b042d01cf56a..c7c165ddb3a825a4e5ce4fc118d39047ce9bf7e8
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> @@ -24898,18 +24898,42 @@ aarch64_sve_expand_vector_init_subvector (rtx 
> target, rtx vals)
>    machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (target);
>    int nelts = XVECLEN (vals, 0);
>
> -  gcc_assert (nelts == 2);
> +  gcc_assert (nelts % 2 == 0);
>
> -  rtx arg0 = XVECEXP (vals, 0, 0);
> -  rtx arg1 = XVECEXP (vals, 0, 1);
> -
> -  /* If we have two elements and are concatting vector.  */
> -  machine_mode elem_mode = GET_MODE (arg0);
> +  /* We have to be concatting vector.  */
> +  machine_mode elem_mode = GET_MODE (XVECEXP (vals, 0, 0));
>    gcc_assert (VECTOR_MODE_P (elem_mode));
>
> -  arg0 = force_reg (elem_mode, arg0);
> -  arg1 = force_reg (elem_mode, arg1);
> -  emit_insn (gen_aarch64_pack_partial (mode, target, arg0, arg1));
> +  auto_vec<rtx> worklist;
> +  machine_mode wider_mode = elem_mode;
> +
> +  for (int i = 0; i < nelts; i++)
> +    worklist.safe_push (force_reg (elem_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)));
> +
> +  /* Keep widening pairwise to have maximum throughput.  */
> +  while (nelts >= 2)
> +    {
> +      wider_mode
> +         = related_vector_mode (wider_mode, GET_MODE_INNER (wider_mode),
> +                                GET_MODE_NUNITS (wider_mode) * 2).require ();

Formatting nit, sorry, but: the last two lines seem to be indented
two columns too far.

> +
> +      for (int i = 0; i < nelts; i += 2)
> +       {
> +         rtx arg0 = worklist[i];
> +         rtx arg1 = worklist[i+1];
> +         gcc_assert (GET_MODE (arg0) == GET_MODE (arg1));
> +
> +         rtx tmp = gen_reg_rtx (wider_mode);
> +         emit_insn (gen_aarch64_pack_partial (wider_mode, tmp, arg0, arg1));
> +         worklist[i / 2] = tmp;
> +       }
> +
> +      nelts /= 2;
> +    }
> +
> +  gcc_assert (wider_mode == mode);
> +  emit_move_insn (target, worklist[0]);

The reason I'd suggested using "while (nelts > 2)" and ending with:

  emit_insn (gen_aarch64_pack_partial (mode, target, worklist[0],
                                       worklist[1]));

is that it avoids an unnecessary temporary that would otherwise need to
be cleaned up later.  But I won't insist.

OK with the formatting nit fixed, thanks.

Richard



> +
>    return;
>  }
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md b/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
> index 
> 07b97547cb292e6d4dc1040173a5d5525fb268d5..60bad5c72bc667be19f8224af87ec5451b4b1a9a
>  100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/iterators.md
> @@ -140,9 +140,12 @@ (define_mode_iterator VQ_I [V16QI V8HI V4SI V2DI])
>  ;; VQ without 2 element modes.
>  (define_mode_iterator VQ_NO2E [V16QI V8HI V4SI V8HF V4SF V8BF])
>
> +;; SVE modes without 2 and 4 element modes.
> +(define_mode_iterator SVE_NO4E [VNx16QI VNx8QI VNx8HI VNx8HF VNx8BF])
> +
>  ;; SVE modes without 2 element modes.
> -(define_mode_iterator SVE_NO2E [VNx16QI VNx8QI VNx4QI VNx8HI VNx4HI VNx8HF
> -                               VNx4HF VNx8BF VNx4BF VNx4SI VNx4SF])
> +(define_mode_iterator SVE_NO2E [SVE_NO4E VNx4QI VNx4HI VNx4HF VNx4BF VNx4SI
> +                               VNx4SF])
>
>  ;; 2 element quad vector modes.
>  (define_mode_iterator VQ_2E [V2DI V2DF])
> @@ -1764,6 +1767,11 @@ (define_mode_attr Vhalf [(V8QI "v4qi")  (V16QI "v8qi")
>                          (VNx8BF "vnx4bf")  (VNx4BF "vnx2bf")
>                          (VNx4SI "vnx2si")  (VNx4SF "vnx2sf")])
>
> +;; Quad modes of all vector modes, in lower-case.
> +(define_mode_attr Vquad [(VNx16QI "vnx4qi") (VNx8QI "vnx2qi")
> +                        (VNx8HI "vnx2hi")  (VNx8HF "vnx2hf")
> +                        (VNx8BF "vnx2bf")])
> +
>  ;; Single-element half modes of quad vector modes.
>  (define_mode_attr V1HALF [(V2DI "V1DI")  (V2DF  "V1DF")])
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-simd-clone-3.c 
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-simd-clone-3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 
> 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb50da1f714ce929da0e35b7d9fead2d93476cb9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/vect-simd-clone-3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile }  */
> +/* { dg-options "-std=c99" } */
> +/* { dg-additional-options "-O3 -march=armv8-a" } */
> +
> +#pragma GCC target ("+sve")
> +extern char __attribute__ ((simd, const)) fn3 (int, short);
> +void test_fn3 (float *a, float *b, double *c, int n)
> +{
> +  for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
> +    a[i] = fn3 (b[i], c[i]);
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\s+_ZGVsMxvv_fn3\n} } } */
> +
> +extern char __attribute__ ((simd, const)) fn4 (int, char);
> +void test_fn4 (float *a, float *b, double *c, int n)
> +{
> +  for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
> +    a[i] = fn4 (b[i], c[i]);
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\s+_ZGVsMxvv_fn4\n} } } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\s+uzp1\tz[0-9]+\.b, z[0-9]+\.b, 
> z[0-9]+\.b\n} 6 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\s+uzp1\tz[0-9]+\.h, z[0-9]+\.h, 
> z[0-9]+\.h\n} 16 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\s+uzp1\tz[0-9]+\.s, z[0-9]+\.s, 
> z[0-9]+\.s\n} 24 } } */
> +

Reply via email to