Fresh extract and bootstrap, and I dont see those spurious failures I
mnetioned. And everything is good with the port of these patches too on
GCC14. so whenever seems reasonable.
Andrew
On 11/1/24 17:10, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
It eas an existing branch. I will get a scrtach branch and do
everything from scratch the beginning of the week.
IM always suspicious there is something laying around when its been
there a while :-) Who knows what I was doing with it 8 months ago :-)
Let me know if these feels more stable.. it should.
Andrew
On 11/1/24 17:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 05:00:05PM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
no, I mean those are on the branch as is... at least when I
extracted and
built stage 1 release gcc14 branch. UNless there was something wrong
with my
build which I havent verified.. it was just a first cut.
Strange. I certainly don't see those.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-November/829576.html
also doesn't.
All I see as FAILs for g++ tests are:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C -std=c++23 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-pr67774.C -std=c++26 (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/guality/pr55665.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin
-flto-partition=none line 23 p == 40
(when testing with my usual GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,23,26)
Neither Fedora 14.2.1 build a week ago:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/gcc/14.2.1/5.fc42/data/logs/x86_64/build.log
Jakub
