On 10/29/24 10:57 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
Certainly open to more ideas on the naming, which I think will impact
the documentation & comments as well.
And to be 100% clear, no concerns with the behavior of the patch, it's
really just the naming convention, documentation/comments.
Thoughts?
I agree the NARROW/WIDE stuff is obfuscating things in technicalities.
How about TARGET_SCHED_PRESSURE_SPILL_AGGRESSIVE with true (default) being
existing behavior and false being new semantics.
Its a bit verbose but I think clear enough.
Sure. I can live with that.
ps. I've got to get out of my bubble more often. Picked up a bug at
the RVI summit... Clearly my immune system isn't firing on all cylinders.
Oh gosh. Get well soon !
Doing better, mostly because I'm trying to minimize how much talking I
do today. That in turn keeps my throat from getting more irritated.
Jeff
