On 29 June 2012 12:23, Carrot Wei <car...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> So the following is updated patch. Tested on qemu with arm/thumb modes

Assuming this testing was with and without neon ? Because the patterns
changed are different whether you use Neon or not.

> without regression.

Can you add some tests for all 4 cases ? See comments inline below for
some changes ?

Ok with those changes if no regressions for above mentioned testing.

>
> thanks
> Carrot
>
>
> 2012-06-29  Wei Guozhi  <car...@google.com>
>
>        PR target/53447
>        * gcc.target/arm/pr53447-1.c: New testcase.
>        * gcc.target/arm/pr53447-2.c: New testcase.
>
>
> 2012-06-29  Wei Guozhi  <car...@google.com>
>
>        PR target/53447
>        * config/arm/arm-protos.h (const_ok_for_dimode_op): New prototype.
>        * config/arm/arm.c (const_ok_for_dimode_op): New function.
>        * config/arm/constraints.md (Dd): New constraint.
>        * config/arm/predicates.md (arm_adddi_operand): New predicate.
>        * config/arm/arm.md (adddi3): Extend it to handle constants.
>        (arm_adddi3): Likewise.
>        (addsi3_carryin_<optab>): Extend it to handle sbc case.
>        * config/arm/neon.md (adddi3_neon): Extend it to handle constants.
>
>
> Index: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr53447-1.c
> ===================================================================
> --- testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr53447-1.c        (revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr53447-1.c        (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" }  */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mov" } } */
> +
> +void t0p(long long * p)
> +{
> +  *p += 0x100000001;
> +}
> Index: testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr53447-2.c
> ===================================================================
> --- testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr53447-2.c        (revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr53447-2.c        (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" }  */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mov" } } */
> +
> +void t0p(long long * p)
> +{
> +  *p -= 0x100000008;
> +}
> Index: config/arm/arm.c
> ===================================================================
> --- config/arm/arm.c    (revision 187751)
> +++ config/arm/arm.c    (working copy)
> @@ -2497,6 +2497,28 @@
>     }
>  }
>
> +/* Return true if I is a valid di mode constant for the operation CODE.  */
> +int
> +const_ok_for_dimode_op (HOST_WIDE_INT i, enum rtx_code code)
> +{
> +  HOST_WIDE_INT hi_val = (i >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +  HOST_WIDE_INT lo_val = i & 0xFFFFFFFF;
> +  rtx hi = GEN_INT (hi_val);
> +  rtx lo = GEN_INT (lo_val);
> +
> +  if (TARGET_THUMB1)
> +    return 0;
> +
> +  switch (code)
> +    {
> +    case PLUS:
> +      return arm_not_operand (hi, SImode) && arm_add_operand (lo, SImode);
> +
> +    default:
> +      return 0;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /* Emit a sequence of insns to handle a large constant.
>    CODE is the code of the operation required, it can be any of SET, PLUS,
>    IOR, AND, XOR, MINUS;
> Index: config/arm/arm-protos.h
> ===================================================================
> --- config/arm/arm-protos.h     (revision 187751)
> +++ config/arm/arm-protos.h     (working copy)
> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
>  extern bool arm_modes_tieable_p (enum machine_mode, enum machine_mode);
>  extern int const_ok_for_arm (HOST_WIDE_INT);
>  extern int const_ok_for_op (HOST_WIDE_INT, enum rtx_code);
> +extern int const_ok_for_dimode_op (HOST_WIDE_INT, enum rtx_code);
>  extern int arm_split_constant (RTX_CODE, enum machine_mode, rtx,
>                               HOST_WIDE_INT, rtx, rtx, int);
>  extern RTX_CODE arm_canonicalize_comparison (RTX_CODE, rtx *, rtx *);
> Index: config/arm/neon.md
> ===================================================================
> --- config/arm/neon.md  (revision 187751)
> +++ config/arm/neon.md  (working copy)
> @@ -588,9 +588,9 @@
>  )
>
>  (define_insn "adddi3_neon"
> -  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand" "=w,?&r,?&r,?w")
> -        (plus:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" "%w,0,0,w")
> -                 (match_operand:DI 2 "s_register_operand" "w,r,0,w")))
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand" "=w,?&r,?&r,?w,?&r,?&r,?&r")
> +        (plus:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" "%w,0,0,w,r,0,r")
> +                 (match_operand:DI 2 "arm_adddi_operand"
> "w,r,0,w,r,Dd,Dd")))
>    (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
>   "TARGET_NEON"
>  {
> @@ -600,13 +600,16 @@
>     case 3: return "vadd.i64\t%P0, %P1, %P2";
>     case 1: return "#";
>     case 2: return "#";
> +    case 4: return "#";
> +    case 5: return "#";
> +    case 6: return "#";
>     default: gcc_unreachable ();
>     }
>  }
> -  [(set_attr "neon_type" "neon_int_1,*,*,neon_int_1")
> -   (set_attr "conds" "*,clob,clob,*")
> -   (set_attr "length" "*,8,8,*")
> -   (set_attr "arch" "nota8,*,*,onlya8")]
> +  [(set_attr "neon_type" "neon_int_1,*,*,neon_int_1,*,*,*")
> +   (set_attr "conds" "*,clob,clob,*,clob,clob,clob")
> +   (set_attr "length" "*,8,8,*,8,8,8")
> +   (set_attr "arch" "nota8,*,*,onlya8,*,*,*")]
>  )
>
>  (define_insn "*sub<mode>3_neon"
> Index: config/arm/constraints.md
> ===================================================================
> --- config/arm/constraints.md   (revision 187751)
> +++ config/arm/constraints.md   (working copy)
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
>  ;; in Thumb-1 state: I, J, K, L, M, N, O
>
>  ;; The following multi-letter normal constraints have been used:
> -;; in ARM/Thumb-2 state: Da, Db, Dc, Dn, Dl, DL, Dv, Dy, Di, Dt, Dz
> +;; in ARM/Thumb-2 state: Da, Db, Dc, Dd, Dn, Dl, DL, Dv, Dy, Di, Dt, Dz
>  ;; in Thumb-1 state: Pa, Pb, Pc, Pd, Pe
>  ;; in Thumb-2 state: Pj, PJ, Ps, Pt, Pu, Pv, Pw, Px, Py
>
> @@ -251,6 +251,12 @@
>       (match_test "TARGET_32BIT && arm_const_double_inline_cost (op) == 4
>                   && !(optimize_size || arm_ld_sched)")))
>
> +(define_constraint "Dd"
> + "@internal
> +  In ARM/Thumb-2 state a const_int that can be used by insn adddi."
> + (and (match_code "const_int")
> +      (match_test "TARGET_32BIT && const_ok_for_dimode_op (ival, PLUS)")))
> +
>  (define_constraint "Di"
>  "@internal
>   In ARM/Thumb-2 state a const_int or const_double where both the high
> Index: config/arm/predicates.md
> ===================================================================
> --- config/arm/predicates.md    (revision 187751)
> +++ config/arm/predicates.md    (working copy)
> @@ -154,6 +154,11 @@
>   (ior (match_operand 0 "arm_rhs_operand")
>        (match_operand 0 "arm_neg_immediate_operand")))
>
> +(define_predicate "arm_adddi_operand"
> +  (ior (match_operand 0 "s_register_operand")
> +       (and (match_code "const_int")
> +           (match_test "const_ok_for_dimode_op (INTVAL (op), PLUS)"))))
> +
>  (define_predicate "arm_addimm_operand"
>   (ior (match_operand 0 "arm_immediate_operand")
>        (match_operand 0 "arm_neg_immediate_operand")))
> Index: config/arm/arm.md
> ===================================================================
> --- config/arm/arm.md   (revision 187751)
> +++ config/arm/arm.md   (working copy)
> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@
>  [(parallel
>    [(set (match_operand:DI           0 "s_register_operand" "")
>          (plus:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" "")
> -                  (match_operand:DI 2 "s_register_operand" "")))
> +                  (match_operand:DI 2 "arm_adddi_operand"  "")))
>     (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))])]
>   "TARGET_EITHER"
>   "
> @@ -609,10 +609,10 @@
>   [(set_attr "length" "4")]
>  )
>
> -(define_insn_and_split "*arm_adddi3"
> -  [(set (match_operand:DI          0 "s_register_operand" "=&r,&r")
> -       (plus:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" "%0, 0")
> -                (match_operand:DI 2 "s_register_operand" "r,  0")))
> +(define_insn_and_split "arm_adddi3"
> +  [(set (match_operand:DI          0 "s_register_operand" "=&r,&r,&r,&r,&r")
> +       (plus:DI (match_operand:DI 1 "s_register_operand" "%0, 0, r, 0, r")
> +                (match_operand:DI 2 "arm_adddi_operand"  "r,  0, r, Dd, 
> Dd")))
>    (clobber (reg:CC CC_REGNUM))]
>   "TARGET_32BIT && !(TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_MAVERICK) && !TARGET_NEON"
>   "#"
> @@ -630,8 +630,17 @@
>     operands[0] = gen_lowpart (SImode, operands[0]);
>     operands[4] = gen_highpart (SImode, operands[1]);
>     operands[1] = gen_lowpart (SImode, operands[1]);
> -    operands[5] = gen_highpart (SImode, operands[2]);
> -    operands[2] = gen_lowpart (SImode, operands[2]);
> +    if (GET_CODE (operands[2]) == CONST_INT)
> +      {
> +       HOST_WIDE_INT v = INTVAL (operands[2]);
> +       operands[5] = GEN_INT (ARM_SIGN_EXTEND ((v >> 32) & 0xFFFFFFFF));
> +       operands[2] = GEN_INT (ARM_SIGN_EXTEND (v & 0xFFFFFFFF));
> +      }
> +    else
> +      {
> +       operands[5] = gen_highpart (SImode, operands[2]);
> +       operands[2] = gen_lowpart (SImode, operands[2]);
> +      }

Instead


  operands[5] = gen_highpart_mode (SImode, DImode, operands[2]);
  operands[2] = gen_lowpart (SImode, operands[2]);

So you don't need a check there.



>   }"
>   [(set_attr "conds" "clob")
>    (set_attr "length" "8")]
> @@ -980,12 +989,14 @@
>  )
>
>  (define_insn "*addsi3_carryin_<optab>"
> -  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r")
> -       (plus:SI (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "%r")
> -                         (match_operand:SI 2 "arm_rhs_operand" "rI"))
> +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "s_register_operand" "=r,r")
> +       (plus:SI (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "s_register_operand" "%r,r")
> +                         (match_operand:SI 2 "arm_not_operand" "rI,K"))
>                 (LTUGEU:SI (reg:<cnb> CC_REGNUM) (const_int 0))))]
>   "TARGET_32BIT"
> -  "adc%?\\t%0, %1, %2"
> +  "@
> +   adc%?\\t%0, %1, %2
> +   sbc%?\\t%0, %1, #%B2"
>   [(set_attr "conds" "use")]
>  )

Any reason why you didn't consider making these changes to the
*addsi3_carryin_alt2<optab> pattern ?


regards,
Ramana


>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
> <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> >  subs -lo ; sbc ~hi - lower negative, upper negative
>> >  subs -lo ; adc hi  - lower negative, upper positive
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>>                 (LTUGEU:SI (reg:<cnb> CC_REGNUM) (const_int 0))))]
>> >>>>   "TARGET_32BIT"
>> >>>> -  "adc%?\\t%0, %1, %2"
>> >>>> +  "@
>> >>>> +  adc%?\\t%0, %1, %2
>> >>>> +  sbc%?\\t%0, %1, %#n2"
>> >
>> > Since constraint "K" is logical not, not negative, should the last
>> > line be following?
>> >
>> > +  sbc%?\\t%0, %1, #%B2"
>>
>> Indeed that was a typo on my part. Sorry about that.
>>
>> Ramana

Reply via email to