Improve handling of constants where the high half can be constructed
by shifting the low half.

gcc/ChangeLog:
        * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_build_integer): Detect constants
        were the higher half is a shift of the lower half.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
        * gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-12.c: New test.
---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc                     | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-12.c | 27 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-12.c

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
index 454220d8ba4..a3e8a243f15 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
@@ -1259,6 +1259,45 @@ riscv_build_integer (struct riscv_integer_op *codes, 
HOST_WIDE_INT value,
              cost = alt_cost;
            }
        }
+
+      if (cost > 4 && !bit31)
+       {
+         int trailing_shift = ctz_hwi (loval) - ctz_hwi (hival);
+         int leading_shift = clz_hwi (loval) - clz_hwi (hival);
+         alt_cost = 2 + riscv_build_integer_1 (alt_codes, sext_hwi (loval, 32),
+                                               mode);
+         /* For constants where the upper half is a shift of the lower half we
+            can do a similar transformation as for constants with the same
+            halves.  */
+         if (alt_cost < cost)
+           {
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 3].save_temporary = true;
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].code = ASHIFT;
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].use_uw = false;
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].save_temporary = false;
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].code = CONCAT;
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].value = 0;
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].use_uw = false;
+             alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].save_temporary = false;
+
+             /* Adjust the shift into the high half accordingly.  */
+             if ((trailing_shift > 0 && hival == (loval >> trailing_shift)) ||
+                  (trailing_shift < 0 && hival == (loval << trailing_shift)))
+               {
+                 alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].value = 32 - trailing_shift;
+                 memcpy (codes, alt_codes, sizeof (alt_codes));
+                 cost = alt_cost;
+               }
+             else if ((leading_shift < 0 && hival == (loval >> leading_shift))
+                       || (leading_shift > 0
+                           && hival == (loval << leading_shift)))
+               {
+                 alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].value = 32 + leading_shift;
+                 memcpy (codes, alt_codes, sizeof (alt_codes));
+                 cost = alt_cost;
+               }
+           }
+       }
     }
 
   return cost;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-12.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-12.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0265a2d6f13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-12.c
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target rv64 } */
+/* We aggressively skip as we really just need to test the basic synthesis
+   which shouldn't vary based on the optimization level.  -O1 seems to work
+   and eliminates the usual sources of extraneous dead code that would throw
+   off the counts.  */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-O2" "-O3" "-Os" "-Oz" "-flto" } } 
*/
+/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc" } */
+
+/* Rather than test for a specific synthesis of all these constants or
+   having thousands of tests each testing one variant, we just test the
+   total number of instructions.
+
+   This isn't expected to change much and any change is worthy of a look.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times 
"\\t(add|addi|bseti|li|pack|ret|sh1add|sh2add|sh3add|slli|srli|xori|or)" 45 } } 
*/
+
+
+unsigned long foo_0x7857f2de7857f2de(void) { return 0x7857f2de7857f2deUL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x7fffdffe3fffefff(void) { return 0x7fffdffe3fffefffUL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x1ffff7fe3fffeffc(void) { return 0x1ffff7fe3fffeffcUL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x0a3fdbf0028ff6fc(void) { return 0x0a3fdbf0028ff6fcUL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x014067e805019fa0(void) { return 0x014067e805019fa0UL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x09d87e90009d87e9(void) { return 0x09d87e90009d87e9UL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x2302320000118119(void) { return 0x2302320000118119UL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x000711eb00e23d60(void) { return 0x000711eb00e23d60UL; }
+unsigned long foo_0x5983800001660e00(void) { return 0x5983800001660e00UL; }
-- 
2.42.0

Reply via email to