From: Raphael Zinsly <rzin...@ventanamicro.com> Improve handling of constants where its upper and lower 32-bit halves are the same and Zbkb is not available in riscv_move_integer. riscv_split_integer already handles this but the changes in riscv_build_integer makes it possible to improve code generation for negative values.
e.g. for: unsigned long f (void) { return 0xf857f2def857f2deUL; } Without the patch: li a0,-128454656 addi a0,a0,734 li a5,-128454656 addi a5,a5,735 slli a5,a5,32 add a0,a5,a0 With the patch: li a0,128454656 addi a0,a0,-735 slli a5,a0,32 add a0,a0,a5 xori a0,a0,-1 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_build_integer): Detect constants with the same 32-bit halves and without Zbkb. (riscv_move_integer): Add synthesys of these constants. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-11.c: New test. Co-authored-by: Jeff Law <j...@ventanamicro.com> --- gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc | 59 +++++++++++++++++-- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-11.c | 40 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-11.c diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc index 8ece7859945..454220d8ba4 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc @@ -1223,6 +1223,43 @@ riscv_build_integer (struct riscv_integer_op *codes, HOST_WIDE_INT value, } } + else if (cost > 3 && TARGET_64BIT && can_create_pseudo_p ()) + { + struct riscv_integer_op alt_codes[RISCV_MAX_INTEGER_OPS]; + int alt_cost; + + unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT loval = value & 0xffffffff; + unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT hival = (value & ~loval) >> 32; + bool bit31 = (hival & 0x80000000) != 0; + /* Without pack we can generate it with a shift 32 followed by an or. */ + if (hival == loval && !bit31) + { + alt_cost = 2 + riscv_build_integer_1 (alt_codes, + sext_hwi (loval, 32), mode); + if (alt_cost < cost) + { + /* We need to save the first constant we build. */ + alt_codes[alt_cost - 3].save_temporary = true; + + /* Now we want to shift the previously generated constant into the + high half. */ + alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].code = ASHIFT; + alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].value = 32; + alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].use_uw = false; + alt_codes[alt_cost - 2].save_temporary = false; + + /* And the final step, IOR the two halves together. Since this uses + the saved temporary, use CONCAT similar to what we do for Zbkb. */ + alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].code = CONCAT; + alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].value = 0; + alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].use_uw = false; + alt_codes[alt_cost - 1].save_temporary = false; + + memcpy (codes, alt_codes, sizeof (alt_codes)); + cost = alt_cost; + } + } + } return cost; } @@ -2786,12 +2823,22 @@ riscv_move_integer (rtx temp, rtx dest, HOST_WIDE_INT value, } else if (codes[i].code == CONCAT || codes[i].code == VEC_MERGE) { - rtx t = can_create_pseudo_p () ? gen_reg_rtx (mode) : temp; - rtx t2 = codes[i].code == VEC_MERGE ? old_value : x; - gcc_assert (t2); - t2 = gen_lowpart (SImode, t2); - emit_insn (gen_riscv_xpack_di_si_2 (t, x, GEN_INT (32), t2)); - x = t; + if (codes[i].code == CONCAT && !TARGET_ZBKB) + { + /* The two values should have no bits in common, so we can + use PLUS instead of IOR which has a higher chance of + using a compressed instruction. */ + x = gen_rtx_PLUS (mode, x, old_value); + } + else + { + rtx t = can_create_pseudo_p () ? gen_reg_rtx (mode) : temp; + rtx t2 = codes[i].code == VEC_MERGE ? old_value : x; + gcc_assert (t2); + t2 = gen_lowpart (SImode, t2); + emit_insn (gen_riscv_xpack_di_si_2 (t, x, GEN_INT (32), t2)); + x = t; + } } else x = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (codes[i].code, mode, diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-11.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-11.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..98401d5ca32 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/synthesis-11.c @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target rv64 } */ +/* We aggressively skip as we really just need to test the basic synthesis + which shouldn't vary based on the optimization level. -O1 seems to work + and eliminates the usual sources of extraneous dead code that would throw + off the counts. */ +/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-Og" "-O2" "-O3" "-Os" "-Oz" "-flto" } } */ +/* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc" } */ + +/* Rather than test for a specific synthesis of all these constants or + having thousands of tests each testing one variant, we just test the + total number of instructions. + + This isn't expected to change much and any change is worthy of a look. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\t(add|addi|bseti|li|pack|ret|sh1add|sh2add|sh3add|slli|srli|xori|or)" 114 } } */ + + + +unsigned long foo_0x7857f2de7857f2de(void) { return 0x7857f2de7857f2deUL; } +unsigned long foo_0x19660e6319660e63(void) { return 0x19660e6319660e63UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x137f1b75137f1b75(void) { return 0x137f1b75137f1b75UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x35019fa035019fa0(void) { return 0x35019fa035019fa0UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x3828e6c13828e6c1(void) { return 0x3828e6c13828e6c1UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x039d87e9039d87e9(void) { return 0x039d87e9039d87e9UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x429617c1429617c1(void) { return 0x429617c1429617c1UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x2411811924118119(void) { return 0x2411811924118119UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x0c01df7d0c01df7d(void) { return 0x0c01df7d0c01df7dUL; } +unsigned long foo_0x70e23d6b70e23d6b(void) { return 0x70e23d6b70e23d6bUL; } +unsigned long foo_0xf857f2def857f2de(void) { return 0xf857f2def857f2deUL; } +unsigned long foo_0x99660e6399660e63(void) { return 0x99660e6399660e63UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x937f1b75937f1b75(void) { return 0x937f1b75937f1b75UL; } +unsigned long foo_0xb5019fa0b5019fa0(void) { return 0xb5019fa0b5019fa0UL; } +unsigned long foo_0xb828e6c1b828e6c1(void) { return 0xb828e6c1b828e6c1UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x839d87e9839d87e9(void) { return 0x839d87e9839d87e9UL; } +unsigned long foo_0xc29617c1c29617c1(void) { return 0xc29617c1c29617c1UL; } +unsigned long foo_0xa4118119a4118119(void) { return 0xa4118119a4118119UL; } +unsigned long foo_0x8c01df7d8c01df7d(void) { return 0x8c01df7d8c01df7dUL; } +unsigned long foo_0xf0e23d6bf0e23d6b(void) { return 0xf0e23d6bf0e23d6bUL; } +unsigned long foo_0x7fff00007fff0000(void) { return 0x7fff00007fff0000UL; } + -- 2.42.0