2024-08-05 23:21  Jiawei <jia...@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
>
>
>在 2024/8/5 22:15, Jeff Law 写道:
>>
>>
>> On 8/4/24 8:20 PM, Jiawei wrote:
>>>
>>> 在 2024/8/5 8:45, Jeff Law 写道:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/2/24 9:32 AM, Jiawei wrote:
>>>>> https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/src/zimop.adoc
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>>>     * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: New extension.
>>>>>     * config/riscv/riscv.opt: New mask.
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>>
>>>>>     * gcc.target/riscv/arch-42.c: New test.
>>>>>     * gcc.target/riscv/arch-43.c: New test.
>>>> Shouldn't the binutils bits go in first?  There's basic support for
>>>> Zimop/Zcmop from Lyut on the binutils list in late 2023 or early
>>>> 2024. I'm pretty sure it marked as DO NOT MERGE because we were
>>>> waiting for the extension to get ratified.
>>>
>>> Christoph informed me that Zimop has been ratified, so we may not
>>> need to worry about the spec lifecycle status:
>>>
>>> https://jira.riscv.org/browse/RVS-1603?src=confmacro
>> Agreed.  No concerns about spec lifecycle at this point.
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if Lyut is doing any RISC-V work right now, so if you
>>>> wanted to ping the patch on his behalf, it'd be appreciated and I
>>>> can handle the review on the binutils side too.
>>>
>>> I found that ESWIN's patch to support Zimop on the binutils mailing
>>> list last month:
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-June/134592.html
>> I don't watch binutils as closely as perhaps I should.
>>
>> That patch looks marginally better than Lyut's version.  It has the
>> updated version #s for the spec and handles the implied extensions.
>> Let's go with Xiao's version.
>>
>> Xiao, the Zimop/Zcmop patches are OK for binutils.
>>
>> Jiawei, the GCC patches are OK once Xiao pushes his changes to the
>> binutils repo.  Alternately if you have permissions in the binutils
>> repo, you can push them for Xiao.
>>
>> Jeff
>
>Thanks Jeff! I think I do not have the permissions in the binutils repo,
>let me contact Nelson to ask him give  some help. 
I am glad that the patch previously submitted can still be discussed and may be 
accepted.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
>
>
>BR,
>
>Jiawei
Thanks
Xiao Zeng

Reply via email to