在 2024/8/1 21:54, Christoph Müllner 写道:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 5:26 AM Jiawei <jia...@iscas.ac.cn> wrote:
This patch adds support for RISC-V RVA23 and RVB23 Profiles[1],
which depend on the base RISC-V Profiles support[2].

[1] 
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/releases/tag/rva23-v0.4-rvb23-v0.1-internal-review
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/658082.html


gcc/ChangeLog:

         * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: New Profiles.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

         * gcc.target/riscv/attribute-22.c: New test.
         * gcc.target/riscv/attribute-23.c: New test.

---
  gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc       | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-22.c | 11 ++++++++++
  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-23.c | 10 ++++++++++
  3 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-22.c
  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-23.c

diff --git a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc 
b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
index 23ae07fe2f3..e6e8adf5e1b 100644
--- a/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
+++ b/gcc/common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc
@@ -323,6 +323,9 @@ static const struct riscv_ext_version 
riscv_ext_version_table[] =
    {"zicclsm",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
    {"ziccrse",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},

+  {"zimop",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
+  {"zcmop",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 1, 0},
+
Independent of the fact that this will be delayed until ratification:
I would prefer to have this in a separate patch as Zimop and Zcmop are
dependencies.
Since Zimop and Zcmop are already ratified, this does not have a
dependency for the profiles ratification.

Ok, I will split it into another patch, thanks!

Jiawei



    {"zicntr", ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 2, 0},
    {"zihpm",  ISA_SPEC_CLASS_NONE, 2, 0},

@@ -467,6 +470,23 @@ static const riscv_profiles riscv_profiles_table[] =
     "_zicclsm_zic64b_za64rs_zihintpause_zba_zbb_zbs_zicbom_zicbop"
     "_zicboz_zfhmin_zkt"},

+  /* RVA23 contains all mandatory base ISA for RVA22U64 and the new extension
+     'v,zihintntl,zvfhmin,zvbb,zvkt,zicond,zimop,zcmop,zfa,zawrs' as mandatory
+     extensions.  */
+  {"RVA23U64", "rv64imafdcv_zicsr_zicntr_zihpm_ziccif_ziccrse_ziccamoa"
+   "_zicclsm_zic64b_za64rs_zihintpause_zba_zbb_zbs_zicbom_zicbop"
+   "_zicboz_zfhmin_zkt_zvfhmin_zvbb_zvkt_zihintntl_zicond_zimop_zcmop_zcb"
+   "_zfa_zawrs"},
+
+
+  /* RVB23 contains all mandatory base ISA for RVA22U64 and the new extension
+     'zihintntl,zicond,zimop,zcmop,zfa,zawrs' as mandatory
+     extensions.  */
+  {"RVB23U64", "rv64imafdc_zicsr_zicntr_zihpm_ziccif_ziccrse_ziccamoa"
+   "_zicclsm_zic64b_za64rs_zihintpause_zba_zbb_zbs_zicbom_zicbop"
+   "_zicboz_zfhmin_zkt_zihintntl_zicond_zimop_zcmop_zcb"
+   "_zfa_zawrs"},
+
    /* Currently we do not define S/M mode Profiles in gcc part.  */

    /* Terminate the list.  */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-22.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-22.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0bbb3242ddd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-22.c
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=RVA23U64 -mabi=lp64" } */
+
+void foo(){}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".attribute arch, 
\"rv64i2p1_m2p0_a2p1_f2p2_d2p2_c2p0"
+"_b1p0_v1p0_zic64b1p0_zicbom1p0_zicbop1p0_zicboz1p0_ziccamoa1p0_ziccif1p0_zicclsm1p0"
+_ziccrse1p0_zicntr2p0_zicond1p0_zicsr2p0_zihintntl1p0_zihintpause2p0_zihpm2p0_zimop1p0"
+_za64rs1p0_zaamo1p0_zalrsc1p0_zawrs1p0_zfa1p0_zfhmin1p0_zca1p0_zcb1p0_zcd1p0_zcmop1p0"
+_zba1p0_zbb1p0_zbs1p0_zkt1p0_zvbb1p0_zve32f1p0_zve32x1p0_zve64d1p0_zve64f1p0_zve64x1p0"
+_zvfhmin1p0_zvkb1p0_zvkt1p0_zvl128b1p0_zvl32b1p0_zvl64b1p0\"" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-23.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-23.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..459b5641ca3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/attribute-23.c
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=RVB23U64 -mabi=lp64" } */
+
+void foo(){}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler ".attribute arch, 
\"rv64i2p1_m2p0_a2p1_f2p2_d2p2_c2p0"
+"_b1p0_zic64b1p0_zicbom1p0_zicbop1p0_zicboz1p0_ziccamoa1p0_ziccif1p0_zicclsm1p0_ziccrse1p0"
+"_zicntr2p0_zicond1p0_zicsr2p0_zihintntl1p0_zihintpause2p0_zihpm2p0_zimop1p0_za64rs1p0"
+"_zaamo1p0_zalrsc1p0_zawrs1p0_zfa1p0_zfhmin1p0_zca1p0_zcb1p0_zcd1p0_zcmop1p0_zba1p0"
+"_zbb1p0_zbs1p0_zkt1p0\"" } } */
--
2.25.1


Reply via email to