Kewen:
On 7/25/24 1:24 AM, Kewen.Lin wrote:
<snip>
optimization the number of assembly generated for the two methods are
similar. With -O3 optimization, the assembly generated for the two
approaches is identical for the 2DF and 2DI types. The assembly for
the C-code version of the 1Ti requres one less assembly instruction.
Nit: s/requres/requires/
Fixed<snip>
fprintf (header_file, "\n");
- fprintf (header_file,
- "#define bif_is_set(x)\t\t((x).bifattrs & bif_set_bit)\n");
fprintf (header_file,
"#define bif_is_extract(x)\t((x).bifattrs & bif_extract_bit)\n");
fprintf (header_file,
@@ -2497,10 +2491,9 @@ write_bif_static_init (void)
fprintf (init_file, " /* nargs */\t%d,\n",
bifp->proto.nargs);
fprintf (init_file, " /* bifattrs */\t0");
- if (bifp->attrs.isset)
- fprintf (init_file, " | bif_set_bit");
if (bifp->attrs.isextract)
fprintf (init_file, " | bif_extract_bit");
+
Nit: unnecessary empty line.
Fixed
Carl
