Hi Mike, on 2024/7/11 01:32, Michael Meissner wrote: > Note, this is a repost of the 3 patches I posted on June 4th. The first two > patches are the same. The third patch modifies the power11 tests to do a > compile instead of assemble, and I removed the power11 specific target support > that was posted as suggested by Kewen.Lin. > > The following 3 patches add support for -mcpu=power11 to GCC 15. Assuming > these patches are approved and go into GCC 15, I will need to back port them > to > GCC 14. > > The first patch adds the basic support for -mcpu=power11, except for the > scheduling infomration. > > The second patch goes through power10.md and adds scheduling support for > power11, treating -mtune=power11 to be the same as -mtune=power10 at the > current time. > > The third patch adds some new tests for -mcpu=power11 support. > > In order to use -mcpu=power11, you will need to use a new enough binutils that > supports the .machine power11 option. > > I have bootstrapped the compiler on both little endian and big endian systems. > There were no regressions in either case. Can I check these patches into the > GCC trunk? After a waiting period assuming there are no issues, can I check > these patches into the GCC 14 branch? >
Thanks for doing this! This patch series looks good to me, as it's still on Segher's review list, I'd leave this to him for final approval, thanks! BR, Kewen
