On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 6:07 AM FX Coudert <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This part of the patch is quite old, but from the remaining log it looks > I got an error here: > > Now on a second thought, this did not require a fix perhaps. We can drop > it. > > I have addressed this: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/656484.html > The test should now be run on all targets, regardless of the issignaling() > macro availability. > Awesome, thank you. I have updated my patch, dropping the change to the test now. > > By the way, do we have some point of comparison from other ppc32 > platforms, Linux or BSD (for the recent gcc master)? > > You can have a look at testresults here: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/ > I checked submissions for several months, but did not find non-Darwin ppc32 ones. Too old ones won't be of much utility for the sake of comparison. Someone on OpenBSD ppc list helped me with running the tests on ppc32, but with gcc11, since building from master did not work. I am not sure whether gcc11 results are comparable. FWIW, on OpenBSD there were 185 unexpected failures, 9 unresolved and 473 unsupported. Sergey
