Bumping the topic. Since this patch exclusively affects powerpc-darwin, and I think we agree that it does not add regressions with tests (no tests which passed without it fail with it), perhaps it can be merged?
It would be great to have it in gcc 15 when it is released, otherwise we will need to wait for the next major version. Once we have the initial support for this, it can be improved further on. P. S. If someone else could run tests also, that would be great. On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 12:15 AM Sergey Fedorov <vital....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2024 at 6:07 AM FX Coudert <fxcoud...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > This part of the patch is quite old, but from the remaining log it >> looks I got an error here: >> > Now on a second thought, this did not require a fix perhaps. We can >> drop it. >> >> I have addressed this: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/656484.html >> The test should now be run on all targets, regardless of the >> issignaling() macro availability. >> > > Awesome, thank you. I have updated my patch, dropping the change to the > test now. > > >> > By the way, do we have some point of comparison from other ppc32 >> platforms, Linux or BSD (for the recent gcc master)? >> >> You can have a look at testresults here: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/ >> > > I checked submissions for several months, but did not find non-Darwin > ppc32 ones. Too old ones won't be of much utility for the sake of > comparison. > Someone on OpenBSD ppc list helped me with running the tests on ppc32, but > with gcc11, since building from master did not work. I am not sure whether > gcc11 results are comparable. FWIW, on OpenBSD there were 185 unexpected > failures, 9 unresolved and 473 unsupported. > > Sergey >
