Hello, Rainer, Thanks for the report!
On Jul 3, 2024, Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > unfortunately this patch caused two regressions on Solaris/x86: > FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-attr.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray[^\\\\n]*inline > copy in test" > both 32 and 64-bit. Solaris/x86 does default to -fno-omit-frame-pointer. > This failure was fixed before by > commit 499d00127d39ba894b0f7216d73660b380bdc325 > Author: Hongyu Wang <hongyu.w...@intel.com> > Date: Wed May 15 11:24:34 2024 +0800 > i386: Fix ix86_option override after change [PR 113719] > Obviously the two patches interact badly. Interesting. The earlier patch had regressed this very test on other x86 targets configured with --enable-frame-pointer. The effect of this configure flag should be the same as defaulting to -fno-omit-frame-pointer, no? I wonder what it is that Solaris does different. Hmm, I wonder if leaf frame pointer has to do with that. I've seen the machinery for that enabling the -fomit-frame-pointer infrastructure with some nonstandard value, which confused at least the active optimization options dumping. I wonder if that's related with the failure on Solaris. I'll have a look, hopefully no later than next week. -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
