On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 05:46:47AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 3, 2012, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 3, 2012, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> My recent patch for PR48866
>
> > ... had some inconsistency in behavior between dce and word_dce, as you
> > pointed out. I couldn't find any reason for that, so I made them the
> > same.
>
> > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu
>
> > for gcc/ChangeLog
> > from Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com>
>
> > PR debug/52983
> > PR debug/48866
> > * dce.c (word_dce_process_block): Insert debug temps only if the
> > insn is not marked.
> > (dce_process_block): Likewise, and if debug.used is not empty,
> > and only after iterating over all DEFs that might mark the insn.
>
> Ping? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00301.html
Ok. Thanks.
Jakub
