On May 3, 2012, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote: > On May 3, 2012, Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> wrote: >> My recent patch for PR48866
> ... had some inconsistency in behavior between dce and word_dce, as you > pointed out. I couldn't find any reason for that, so I made them the > same. > Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu > for gcc/ChangeLog > from Alexandre Oliva <aol...@redhat.com> > PR debug/52983 > PR debug/48866 > * dce.c (word_dce_process_block): Insert debug temps only if the > insn is not marked. > (dce_process_block): Likewise, and if debug.used is not empty, > and only after iterating over all DEFs that might mark the insn. Ping? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00301.html -- Alexandre Oliva home: +55 19 32435233 cell: +55 19 97143658 OS Tools Compiler Engineer I am Red Hat Brazil You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi Be Free! -- FSFLA.org FSF Latin America board member
