Wednesday, April 10, 2024 8:40 PM Richard Sandiford <richard.sandif...@arm.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the updates and sorry again for the slow review. > I've replied to some of the patches in the series but otherwise it looks good > to > me. > > If you agree with the suggested changes then the series is OK for stage 1, > assuming no objections from those with an interest in the > x86 cygwin/mingw port. > > Richard Thank you, Richard, for the review! v3 addresses all comments on v2. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-April/thread.html#649261 Regards, Evgeny
