> > Well, perhaps the feature would be more useful with command line option > > allowing > > to add an attribute instead of having special case command line options for > > individual > > cases. > > Hi, Honza, I'm not sure what you mean by "command line option allowing > to add an attribution". But this seems what this patch does: it adds > attributes to functions with specified name patterns.
I mean that if we want to go this route, we may want to allow this interface to i.e. add always_inline attrbute or noinline or such. I can imagine this to be useful especially for languages that has no attributes. > > > I guess the problem would be also solvable with header included after > > the library adding the attributes to the declarations > > > > typeof (printf) printf __attribute__ ((cold)); > > Do you mean that for each specific application, we extract a common > header file to include all function annotations, and all source files > will include this header file? Yes, something like that... Where do you use the likely_hot/likely_cold logic? Honza > > Thanks, > Dehao > > > > > Honza > >> > >> thanks, > >> > >> David > >> > Honza
