> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hongtao Liu <crazy...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 2:06 PM
> To: Jiang, Haochen <haochen.ji...@intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>; haochen.jiang
> <haoch...@ecsmtp.sh.intel.com>; gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [r14-6420 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c scan-
> assembler-times shrq 2 on Linux/x86_64
> 
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:47 PM Jiang, Haochen via Gcc-regression
> <gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jiang, Haochen
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 9:11 AM
> > > To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>; haochen.jiang
> > > <haoch...@ecsmtp.sh.intel.com>; gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-
> > > patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> > > Subject: RE: [r14-6420 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c
> scan-
> > > assembler-times shrq 2 on Linux/x86_64
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 9:01 AM
> > > > To: haochen.jiang <haoch...@ecsmtp.sh.intel.com>; Andrew Pinski
> (QUIC)
> > > > <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>; gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-
> > > > patc...@gcc.gnu.org; Jiang, Haochen <haochen.ji...@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: RE: [r14-6420 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c
> > > scan-
> > > > assembler-times shrq 2 on Linux/x86_64
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: haochen.jiang <haoch...@ecsmtp.sh.intel.com>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 4:54 PM
> > > > > To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>; gcc-
> > > > > regress...@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> > > haochen.ji...@intel.com
> > > > > Subject: [r14-6420 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c
> scan-
> > > > > assembler-times shrq 2 on Linux/x86_64
> > > > >
> > > > > On Linux/x86_64,
> > > > >
> > > > > 85c5efcffed19ca6160eeecc2d4faebd9fee63aa is the first bad commit
> > > commit
> > > > > 85c5efcffed19ca6160eeecc2d4faebd9fee63aa
> > > > > Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apin...@quicinc.com>
> > > > > Date:   Sat Nov 11 15:54:10 2023 -0800
> > > > >
> > > > >     MATCH: (convert)(zero_one !=/== 0/1) for outer type and zero_one
> type
> > > are
> > > > > the same
> > > > >
> > > > > caused
> > > > >
> > > > > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c scan-assembler-times shrq 2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > So I think this is a testsuite issue, in that shrx instruction is being 
> > > > used
> here
> > > > instead of just ` shrq` due to that instruction being enabled with `-
> > > > march=cascadelake` .
> > > > Can someone confirm that and submit a testcase change?
> > >
> > > I will do that today.
> >
> > I suppose we might just need to change the scan-asm from shrq to shr to
> cover
> > shrx.
> Please use shr\[qx\], not shr.

I see. I will take that.

Thx,
Haochen

> >
> > Is that ok? If it is, I will commit a patch to change that.
> >
> > Thx,
> > Haochen
> >
> > >
> > > Thx,
> > > Haochen
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > with GCC configured with
> > > > >
> > > > > ../../gcc/configure --prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-
> > > > > bisect/master/master/r14-6420/usr --enable-clocale=gnu --with-
> system-
> > > zlib -
> > > > > -with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-
> > > languages=c,c++,fortran --
> > > > > enable-cet --without-isl --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-
> bootstrap
> > > > >
> > > > > To reproduce:
> > > > >
> > > > > $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check
> > > > > RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/pr110790-2.c --
> > > > > target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'"
> > > > >
> > > > > (Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report,
> contact
> > > me at
> > > > > haochen dot jiang at intel.com.) (If you met problems with cascadelake
> > > > > related, disabling AVX512F in command line might save that.)
> (However,
> > > > > please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
> 
> 
> 
> --
> BR,
> Hongtao

Reply via email to