On 28/11/2023 23:26, Jeff Law wrote:


On 11/28/23 15:18, Jivan Hakobyan wrote:
    The amdgcn ICE I reported still exists:


Can you send a build command to reproduce ICE.
I built on x86-64, RV32/64, and did not get any faults.
THe code is clearly wrong though.  We need to test that we have a subreg before we look at the subreg_byte.  I fixed one of those elsewhere, this may ultimately be a paste-o.  Anyway, I'll fix it for V3.

I have confirmed that swapping the conditions fixes the ICE.

I haven't yet observed the pass having any affect on amdgcn, but it's also not broken anything in the limited testing I did.

Andrew

Reply via email to