On 17 May 2012 19:25, Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@integrable-solutions.net> wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Chung-Lin Tang > <clt...@codesourcery.com> wrote: >> On 2012/5/17 01:55 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >>>> I'm guessing these changes are the cause of a full C bootstrap >>>> > (--disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx) failure I'm seeing on trunk. The >>>> > *_handle_option_auto function prototypes are not seen in options.c, and >>>> > -Werror -Wmissing-prototypes are in effect (oddly, such strict checking >>>> > is not enforced in the default post-stage1 C++ bootstrap) >>> Yep, We should add -Wmissing-declarations to the post-stage1 flags, >>> which also exists in C. Could you also add that to your patch? >>> >> >> I'm a little unsure of how -Wmissing-declarations vs >> -Wmissing-prototypes behave for C? Anyways here's a patch to add >> -Wmissing-declarations for C++, keeping C as is. > > What is the purpose of -Wmissing-declarations for C++?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 Cheers, Manuel.
