Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes: >> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> >> Jakub: do you remember what the reason was? I don't mind dropping >> >> "function", but it feels weird to drop the quotes around "simd". >> >> Seems like, if we do that, there'll one day be a patch to add >> >> them back. :) >> > >> > Because in OpenMP their are %<declare simd%> functions, not %<simd> >> > %functions, but we also have the %<simd%>/%<gnu::simd%> attribute as >> > extension. >> >> Yeah, I can understand dropping the "function" bit. But why >> s/unsupported ... for %<simd%>/unsupported ... for simd/? >> Even if it's only a partial syntax quote, it is still a syntax quote. > > %<simd%> in OpenMP is something very different though, so I think it is > better to use it as a generic term which covers the different syntax cases.
OK, I won't press it further. Richard
