On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 06:27:20PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 05:55:28PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> Jakub: do you remember what the reason was? I don't mind dropping
> >> "function", but it feels weird to drop the quotes around "simd".
> >> Seems like, if we do that, there'll one day be a patch to add
> >> them back. :)
> >
> > Because in OpenMP their are %<declare simd%> functions, not %<simd>
> > %functions, but we also have the %<simd%>/%<gnu::simd%> attribute as
> > extension.
>
> Yeah, I can understand dropping the "function" bit. But why
> s/unsupported ... for %<simd%>/unsupported ... for simd/?
> Even if it's only a partial syntax quote, it is still a syntax quote.
%<simd%> in OpenMP is something very different though, so I think it is
better to use it as a generic term which covers the different syntax cases.
Jakub
