[PATCH 1/2] bpf: don't print () in bpf_print_operand_address

[David Faust via Gcc-patches]

Unfortunately, the pseudo-C dialect syntax used for some of the v3
atomic instructions clashes with unconditionally printing the
surrounding parentheses in bpf_print_operand_address.

Instead, place the parentheses in the output templates where needed.

Tested in bpf-unknown-none.
OK?

gcc/

        * config/bpf/bpf.cc (bpf_print_operand_address): Don't print
        enclosing parentheses for pseudo-C dialect.
        * config/bpf/bpf.md (zero_exdendhidi2): Add parentheses around
        operands of pseudo-C dialect output templates where needed.
        (zero_extendqidi2): Likewise.
        (zero_extendsidi2): Likewise.
        (*mov<MM:mode>): Likewise.
---
 gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc |  8 ++++----
 gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md | 12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc
index 55b6927a62f..2c077ea834e 100644
--- a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.cc
@@ -933,9 +933,9 @@ bpf_print_operand_address (FILE *file, rtx addr)
   switch (GET_CODE (addr))
     {
     case REG:
-      fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "[" : "(");
+      fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "[" : "");
       bpf_print_register (file, addr, 0);
-      fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "+0]" : "+0)");
+      fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "+0]" : "+0");
       break;
     case PLUS:
       {
@@ -944,11 +944,11 @@ bpf_print_operand_address (FILE *file, rtx addr)
 
        if (GET_CODE (op0) == REG && GET_CODE (op1) == CONST_INT)
          {
-           fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "[" : "(");
+           fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "[" : "");
            bpf_print_register (file, op0, 0);
            fprintf (file, "+");
            output_addr_const (file, op1);
-           fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "]" : ")");
+           fprintf (file, asm_dialect == ASM_NORMAL ? "]" : "");
          }
        else
          fatal_insn ("invalid address in operand", addr);
diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
index 64342ea1de2..579a8213b09 100644
--- a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
+++ b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ (define_insn "zero_extendhidi2"
   "@
    {and\t%0,0xffff|%0 &= 0xffff}
    {mov\t%0,%1\;and\t%0,0xffff|%0 = %1;%0 &= 0xffff}
-   {ldxh\t%0,%1|%0 = *(u16 *) %1}"
+   {ldxh\t%0,%1|%0 = *(u16 *) (%1)}"
   [(set_attr "type" "alu,alu,ldx")])
 
 (define_insn "zero_extendqidi2"
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ (define_insn "zero_extendqidi2"
   "@
    {and\t%0,0xff|%0 &= 0xff}
    {mov\t%0,%1\;and\t%0,0xff|%0 = %1;%0 &= 0xff}
-   {ldxh\t%0,%1|%0 = *(u8 *) %1}"
+   {ldxh\t%0,%1|%0 = *(u8 *) (%1)}"
   [(set_attr "type" "alu,alu,ldx")])
 
 (define_insn "zero_extendsidi2"
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ (define_insn "zero_extendsidi2"
   ""
   "@
    * return bpf_has_alu32 ? \"{mov32\t%0,%1|%0 = %1}\" : 
\"{mov\t%0,%1\;and\t%0,0xffffffff|%0 = %1;%0 &= 0xffffffff}\";
-   {ldxw\t%0,%1|%0 = *(u32 *) %1}"
+   {ldxw\t%0,%1|%0 = *(u32 *) (%1)}"
   [(set_attr "type" "alu,ldx")])
 
 ;;; Sign-extension
@@ -319,11 +319,11 @@ (define_insn "*mov<MM:mode>"
         (match_operand:MM 1 "mov_src_operand"      " q,rI,B,r,I"))]
   ""
   "@
-   {ldx<mop>\t%0,%1|%0 = *(<smop> *) %1}
+   {ldx<mop>\t%0,%1|%0 = *(<smop> *) (%1)}
    {mov\t%0,%1|%0 = %1}
    {lddw\t%0,%1|%0 = %1 ll}
-   {stx<mop>\t%0,%1|*(<smop> *) %0 = %1}
-   {st<mop>\t%0,%1|*(<smop> *) %0 = %1}"
+   {stx<mop>\t%0,%1|*(<smop> *) (%0) = %1}
+   {st<mop>\t%0,%1|*(<smop> *) (%0) = %1}"
 [(set_attr "type" "ldx,alu,alu,stx,st")])
 
 ;;;; Shifts
-- 
2.40.1