On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 9:13 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 May 2023 at 10:58, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 19:56, Jason Merrill via Libstdc++ < >> libstd...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> Middle-end folks: any thoughts about how best to make the change >>> described in >>> the last paragraph below? >>> >>> Library folks: any thoughts on the changes to __cxa_call_terminate? >>> >> >> I see no harm in exporting it (with the adjusted signature). The "looks >> standard but isn't" name is a little unfortunate, but not a big deal. >> > > Jason, do you have any objection to exporting __cxa_call_terminate for GCC > 13.2 as well, even though the FE won't use it? > That sounds fine. Jason
