Patches attached in to the wrong emails - this patch was actually:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 05:05:51PM +0000, Andrew Carlotti via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Committed as obvious.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * doc/md.texi: Fix incorrect pxref.
>
> ---
diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
index
482e86f15d8b312c67d4962510ce879fb5cbc541..78dc6d720700ca409677e44a34a60d4b7fceb046
100644
--- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
@@ -1511,7 +1511,7 @@ operand 1 (meaning it must match operand 0), and
@samp{dKs} for operand
2. The second alternative has @samp{d} (data register) for operand 0,
@samp{0} for operand 1, and @samp{dmKs} for operand 2. The @samp{=} and
@samp{%} in the constraints apply to all the alternatives; their
-meaning is explained in the next section (@pxref{Class Preferences}).
+meaning is explained in a later section (@pxref{Modifiers}).
If all the operands fit any one alternative, the instruction is valid.
Otherwise, for each alternative, the compiler counts how many instructions
